அண்ட சராசரம் கண்டு நடுங்கிட இந்து தினமணி ஜிஞ்சக்க.. ஜிஞ்சா.. – பாடல்

வினவு,
தில்லை தீட்சிதர்கள் பற்றிய கட்டுரைக்கு மறுமொழி இட முடியவில்லை. என்னவென்று பார்க்கவும். நன்றி.

Thillai temple belongs to dixitar and none else.

// harikumar November 29, 2013 at 1:05 pm
Permalink
2

Thillai temple belongs to dixitar and none else.
// அங்க தமிழ்ல பாடக் கூடக் கூடாது தீட்டுன்னு சொல்றா. அதுனாலதான் இங்க இங்கிலீசுல எழுதுறீங்களோ அரிக்குமார்.

இந்த அசுர கானம் பாடல்கள் அடங்கிய ஒலிப்பேழை கிடைக்குமா.ஏறக்குறைய 20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் கேசட் வடிவில் ம க இ க தோழர்களிடமிருந்து வாங்கி கேட்டு.பலரையும் கேட்க வைத்திருக்கிறேன்

Even after Vinavu has quoted the judgement of the High Court of Madras in 1888 stating that there is no proof to say this temple belongs to Dikshidars,Harikumar repeatedly writes like a person suffering from Janni.Leave him alone.

சூரியன்! அரிகுமார் ஒரு அடாவடி குமார் என்பதுதான் தெரியுமே! பாவம்! ஆயிரம் முறை கூறிக்கொள்ளட்டுமே!

sooriyan

The dixitars got back the temple,more to follow….be safe.

//The dixitars got back the temple…….// ?After their claim is defeated in courts, they retreated. Whwn ever a brahmin domination comes to power at centre and state, they would sprang forward! That is the history of brahmins! If only they treated all hindus equally, starting from temples, there won’t be any untouchability in tamilnadu and their won’t be any conversion to foreign religions.

u r talking about the judgement of 1888?

why would the dikshitars reason with a black/white logic of a white british judge supported by some silly iyer stooge,that too from the delta.

Please dont try to blame untouchability on brahmins now,every single proud reservation eating OBC treats dalits much worse even today.

This old theory is highly silly,lazy people always look for excuses to make easy money.

I know devendra kula vellalar people of my village,our samsari’s grandson works as a civil engineer in dubai now,he did not convert,nor does he eat beef or drink alcohol.

I see such people a good riddance,deadweight.

//why would the dikshitars reason with a black/white logic of a white british judge supported by some silly iyer stooge,that too from the delta..// I think, you deaf and blind Arikumaar! You won’t any bodies judgement, even though it is based reasons! You need an RSS man (moron?) to pronounce judgement as you please! Not a soul with judicial mind will accept your arguments!

when the bias/neutrality of the judge is in question,why should i accept it?

If that judgement was such a hallmark/bedrock of a decision,innaikku indha charchai edharkku?

//when the bias/neutrality of the judge is in question,why should i accept it?// Will this apply to all, including affected people due to ayothyaa judgement and sankararaaman case? No wonder, you having the same opinion about judges as Amma , you will accept only if favourable to you! Strangely, YSR.Jagan, who is also facing charges for amazing wealth beyond means, for expert consultations, I hope! I have a doubt,instead of justice asper Indian constitution, Chanakkiya and manuneethi alone is prevailing!

yes indeed.

Court is a formality in Ayodhya,that mosque had to go regardless of any judgement.

u r a very intelligent person but there ,there is a basis for every judgement,what is the basis for the judgement of 1888?

more stuff,mosques in Kashi & Mathura ll also have to go,there is ASI evidence in each case,even the fake pseudo historians of ASI are not able to refute this.

The ASI evidence you wanted to create in Ayothya, ended up as a fiasco! Anything else you could you refer?